You must login to post a message.
crex
01 October 2007 23:14:51
I wonder if Campsicnemius charliechaplini is a funny fly 

Kahis
01 October 2007 23:11:44
Checked identification of photos on "Musca domestica" pages on various Wikipedias. Only one of ten had the correct species: The Pennsylvanian Dutch wikipedia
sigh.

conopid
01 October 2007 17:57:37
I think you are right Paul. It must have been a temporary server error. The link is fine now.
Paul Beuk
29 September 2007 19:42:06
Hmm, no problems for me. I click the link, the pdf opens in the browser, and I can save it to my computer. Maybe a server error when you tried.
Paul Beuk
29 September 2007 08:25:28
I will address it later. Thx.
conopid
28 September 2007 14:32:28
Paul,
The download in Syrphids - Phylogeny of Palaeartic Syrphidae, returns an access forbidden window, when you try to download it.
jorgemotalmeida
27 September 2007 21:35:53
conopid, the photos ARE NOT mine.
I must acknowledge Tony T for those great photos and I appreciated the fact that Tony T shared these files to me!

conopid
27 September 2007 20:57:01
The setae and morphological photos from Tony T and Jorge are excellent. Paul, can we have a Morphology section under M in the glossary, or better still a new morphology section?
jorgemotalmeida
27 September 2007 20:36:47
Tony Irwin, please see if "the thorax lateral view" thread is alright now. I think so. 

Tony Irwin
27 September 2007 19:48:03
Hi Nikita - if you are in south-east Turkey, could you collect any Scatella with pres DC for me? - I need some good material of the new species from there! Thanks, Tony
crex
26 September 2007 22:50:32
Thoracic Setae ... Nice one Tony T!
crex
26 September 2007 21:43:43
Jorge, read about EDIT 

jorgemotalmeida
26 September 2007 19:00:06
-1 Replies??? 

jorgemotalmeida
24 September 2007 01:07:00
good week for all! 

crex
22 September 2007 13:59:38
Good Job Dysmachus 

jorgemotalmeida
22 September 2007 11:50:50
nikita, Gabon is a very good choice to next country to visit!
if so, please catch some flies for me. 


Paul Beuk
20 September 2007 18:48:53
One of the odd features that Administrators are designated as Moderators, even if they do not have Forum Administration rights. Digi helped me out a while ago with some issues. 

crex
20 September 2007 18:11:26
I had missed the new Overview forum with Digitanium as moderator 

crex
20 September 2007 18:08:53
Bah, you old spammer 

jorgemotalmeida
20 September 2007 18:00:17
you are in the
"Middle ages" posts, crex. 
