Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 28

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· ole00:10:12
· ESant00:20:43
· Bruno4800:27:29
· Nosferatumyia00:30:16
· Tony Irwin00:37:15
· Juergen Peters00:39:03
· Dipterist00:48:01
· Zeegers01:34:45
· Carnifex01:42:06
· weia01:49:08
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Ephydridae - Scatella tenuicosta?
Sundew
#1 Print Post
Posted on 02-07-2020 02:30
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin and Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28.07.07

Hi,
Some weeks ago lots of tiny Ephydrids were busy in a well-wetted flower pot on my balcony. When the soil dried out, they vanished. The shape of the white spot closest to the wing tip make me think of Scatella tenuicosta. Do you agree? - Location is southwestern Germany, 20 km west of Stuttgart.
Thanks, Sundew
Sundew attached the following image:


[274.55Kb]
 
Tony Irwin
#2 Print Post
Posted on 02-07-2020 08:36
User Avatar

Member

Location: Norwich, England
Posts: 7234
Joined: 19.11.04

Yes, S.tenuicosta (now known as Scatella lacustris).
Tony
----------
Tony Irwin
 
Sundew
#3 Print Post
Posted on 02-07-2020 13:53
User Avatar

Member

Location: Berlin and Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28.07.07

Thanks for confirmation! However, the synonymy puzzles me... According to your paper of 2018 (I was not able to find a PDF version online), you see S. stagnalis as a separate species, but GBIF (https://www.gbif....es/9615322), who cites your paper in detail, states that S. lacustris is a synonym of S. stagnalis.
What is right?
 
Tony Irwin
#4 Print Post
Posted on 02-07-2020 14:33
User Avatar

Member

Location: Norwich, England
Posts: 7234
Joined: 19.11.04

In the GBIF link you gave, the left-hand panel does give lacustris as a synonym of stagnalis. This is incorrect. S.stagnalis is a good species, and separate from lacustris (=tenuicosta). I'll PM you about a pdf of the paper.
Tony
----------
Tony Irwin
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Ephydridae > Nostima picta Diptera (adults) 3 21-11-2024 19:46
Ephydridae resources request - resolved What should I use? 6 23-10-2024 09:11
Ephydridae => Limnellia quadrata Diptera (adults) 4 30-09-2024 08:14
Ephydridae: Notiphila sp. Diptera (adults) 4 25-09-2024 18:50
Ephydridae: Scatella paludum Diptera (adults) 5 18-09-2024 14:02
Date and time
27 November 2024 21:31
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

08.11.24 16:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 13:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 11:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 12:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 15:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 13:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 13:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 11:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 08:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 21:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

Render time: 0.48 seconds | 205,066,761 unique visits