Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 18

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· bradbarnd00:54:41
· Nosferatumyia01:42:26
· weia02:12:48
· Juergen Peters02:36:00
· ESant02:37:21
· Carnifex02:52:22
· DedeLab04:52:23
· Joerg Schneider04:52:53
· libor05:05:42
· ole05:24:36
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Small syrphid
Juergen Peters
#1 Print Post
Posted on 17-08-2005 22:12
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13911
Joined: 11.09.04

Hello!

This syrphid was only about half the size of a Syrphus and its stripes were nearly white. I photographed it today on a meadow in Ostwestfalen/Germany and have no idea about the species. Can anybody help me? Thanks in advance!

Addendum: Could it be Parasyrphus macularis?

www.diptera.info/forim/7-0598-1.jpg
www.diptera.info/forim/7-0598-2.jpg
Edited by Juergen Peters on 17-08-2005 22:22
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Gerard Pennards
#2 Print Post
Posted on 18-08-2005 00:00
User Avatar

Member

Location: Amersfoort
Posts: 1914
Joined: 07.06.04

Hello Juergen,
Syrphus vitripennis can be quite small, and also the stripes can be very 'whitish'.
By the color of it's thorax it is very clear that it belongs in the genus Syrphus, and it's size and color leave only S. vitripennis!
Greetings,
Greetings,
Gerard Pennards
 
Juergen Peters
#3 Print Post
Posted on 18-08-2005 17:07
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13911
Joined: 11.09.04

Hello, Gerard!

Gerard Pennards wrote:
Syrphus vitripennis can be quite small, and also the stripes can be very 'whitish'.
By the color of it's thorax it is very clear that it belongs in the genus Syrphus, and it's size and color leave only S. vitripennis!


But it was really very small. The estimation of only half the size of a "normal" Syrphus was no understatement! Unfortunately I don't have it on a picture with another Syrphus, but with a Phaonia (?), which had the size of a normal house fly. On the second picture the same Phaonia individual is with an Episyrphus balteatus which is normally smaller than a Syrphus.

insekteninfos.de/diptera/1708/Phaonia_Syrphid.jpg?

insekteninfos.de/diptera/1708/Phaonia_Episyrphus.jpg

Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Andre
#4 Print Post
Posted on 03-10-2005 13:51
User Avatar

Member

Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Posts: 2111
Joined: 18.07.04

Difficult to see the legs... but it looks Parasyrphus to me. Possibly annulatus, but we cannot be sure. Gerard's suggestion might be right too... vitripennis can be very very small. Did it have a darkened facial knob or facial stripe?
 
www.biomongol.org
Juergen Peters
#5 Print Post
Posted on 03-10-2005 21:37
User Avatar

Member

Location: northwest Germany
Posts: 13911
Joined: 11.09.04

Hello, Andre!

Andre wrote:
Difficult to see the legs... but it looks Parasyrphus to me. Possibly annulatus, but we cannot be sure. Gerard's suggestion might be right too... vitripennis can be very very small. Did it have a darkened facial knob or facial stripe?


Here is another picture, more from the front. Maybe that helps.

insekteninfos.de/diptera/1708/small_syrphid.jpg
Edited by Juergen Peters on 03-10-2005 21:39
Best regards,
Jürgen

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Juergen Peters
Borgholzhausen, Germany
WWW: http://insektenfo...
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
http://insektenfotos.de/forum
Andre
#6 Print Post
Posted on 07-10-2005 08:17
User Avatar

Member

Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Posts: 2111
Joined: 18.07.04

Yes, I am pretty confident it's annulatus.
Catch it next time and use the DJN Schwebfliegen-schl?ssel for positive identification without having to kill the flie, I'd say Pfft
 
www.biomongol.org
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Syrphid larvae? Diptera (eggs, larvae, pupae) 4 05-11-2024 11:55
small one for ID Diptera (adults) 7 24-10-2024 09:11
Small autumn Cheilosia (?) (04.10.24) --> Cheilosia cf. vernalis Syrphidae 3 16-10-2024 18:45
Not too small Tachinid from 06.10.24 --> Sturmia bella Diptera (adults) 6 12-10-2024 10:13
Small black-yellow fly? Diptera (adults) 3 11-10-2024 20:46
Date and time
27 November 2024 04:10
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

08.11.24 17:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 22:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

Render time: 2.97 seconds | 205,019,446 unique visits