Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 mating flies - not < 18 years -
|
|
| Robert Heemskerk |
Posted on 14-09-2006 10:08
|
 Member Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands Posts: 2082 Joined: 17.10.05 |
hello flyforum, These redish big-eyed flies enjoyed the nice wheather of this week in september. Must be a attempt for a last generation this year.. place: Amsterdam Forest What kind of flies are these? robert heemskerk Robert Heemskerk attached the following image:  [85.66Kb] |
 |
|
| Robert Heemskerk |
Posted on 14-09-2006 10:08
|
|
Member Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands Posts: 2082 Joined: 17.10.05 |
Robert Heemskerk attached the following image:  [91.48Kb] Edited by Robert Heemskerk on 14-09-2006 10:09 |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 14-09-2006 10:56
|
 Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
Pipunculus (Pipunculidae)
Kahis |
|
|
|
| Robert Heemskerk |
Posted on 14-09-2006 11:26
|
|
Member Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands Posts: 2082 Joined: 17.10.05 |
Thank you for your comment Kahis! robert  |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 14-09-2006 14:38
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19403 Joined: 11.05.04 |
Kahis, are the setae on the mesonotum not too short for Pipunculus? I thought they might be Tomosvaryella...
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| David Gibbs |
Posted on 14-09-2006 14:54
|
 Member Location: Bristol, UK Posts: 833 Joined: 17.06.06 |
certainly Pipunculus, very likley Pipunculus campestris Latreille, 1802 |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 14-09-2006 16:04
|
|
Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
Paul Beuk wrote: Kahis, are the setae on the mesonotum not too short for Pipunculus? I thought they might be Tomosvaryella... Definitely not Not too short that is, and also definitely not Tomosvaryella as that genus has crossvein R-M near middle of discal cell.
Kahis |
|
|
|
| Kahis |
Posted on 14-09-2006 16:12
|
|
Member Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 1999 Joined: 02.09.04 |
David Gibbs wrote: certainly Pipunculus, very likely Pipunculus campestris Latreille, 1802 Perhaps, but Pipunculus is still unrevised and nobody has apparently seen the types of P. campestris; all descriptions of this species are based on wishful thinking, not type material. The types have apparently been found in Paris and I know that Dr. Kehlmaier is now working with this rather problematic genus. Kahis |
|
|
|
| David Gibbs |
Posted on 14-09-2006 16:20
|
|
Member Location: Bristol, UK Posts: 833 Joined: 17.06.06 |
quite so, i revise my comment to "very likley the species we call Pipunculus campestris in Britain" |
|
|
|
| Robert Heemskerk |
Posted on 16-09-2006 21:54
|
|
Member Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands Posts: 2082 Joined: 17.10.05 |
thank you all, I'll call it Pipunculus sp. (Pipunculidae) robert, |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |