Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 7

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,984
· Newest Member: Chamdab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Tony Irwin00:10:06
· ESant00:12:14
· RamiP00:16:11
· smol00:34:54
· Jan Maca00:38:37
· pierred00:48:25
· Ira Orlicek01:20:18
· Carnifex01:30:05
· Volker03:22:29
· nowaytofly05:06:19
Latest Photo Additions
View Photo
Photo Albums > Tachinidae > Ectophasia crassipennis (2) << >>
8.jpg
North Poland

Last update: 05.10.07 21:36
Added by: mwkozlowski
Dimensions: 499 x 374 pixels
Filesize: 41.5Kb
Comments: 7
Rating: None
Number of views: 4781
WARNING!
Report any errors in this Gallery at
https://diptera.info/forum/viewforum.php?forum_id=25,
NOT as comments with pictures...
Comments to that extent left with a picture
will simply be deleted and not acted upon.
Comments
#1 | Zeegers on 23 September 2007 11:58:27
Are we sure it's not crassipennis ?
Oblonga is not really to be expected in north Poland


Theo
#2 | Paul Beuk on 23 September 2007 22:18:34
Hehe, I am just the dude putting the images in the Gallery and will not hazard a guess here. Let's wait for the photogrpaher to hear his arguments.
#3 | jorgemotalmeida on 03 October 2007 09:51:36
This is rather different for my probable Ectophasia oblonga.
More... it hasn't reddish abdomen, and here it is very clear a vitta on abdomen.. I think E. oblonga doesn't have any black stripe on abdomen, not sure, though.
#4 | ChrisR on 03 October 2007 11:18:32
Ectophasia oblonga is keyed on (amongst others): an abdomen that is: noticably longer than wide, with a redder colour and much narrower (or absent) longitudinal stripe. It also lacks dusting on the thorax, infront of the scutellum. This specimen appears to have faint dusting infront of the scutellum and the abdomen looks orange (not red) and doesn't look to be long enough. It is hard to see the abdomen clearly of course in this photo, which begs the question - "how did the original poster confirm this identification?" It certainly doesn't look like E.oblonga to me so can the original poster let us know how it was identified? Smile
#5 | jorgemotalmeida on 03 October 2007 11:33:14
Comparing with my E. oblonga (confirmation by Liekele) with this specimen, and knowing previously some features for this species, I am sure that this photo doesn't belong to the Ectophasia oblonga. I might be wrong, though, but I'm eager to "hear" mwkozlowski. Smile
#6 | mwkozlowski on 05 October 2007 20:48:52
Thanks a lot for valuable correction, I have no new argument for my ID, just wrong! Paul, coud you correct this somehow, to prevenr the propagation of a wrong name?
#7 | Paul Beuk on 05 October 2007 21:37:02
Done.
Post Comment
Please Login to Post a Comment.
Ratings
Rating is available to Members only.

Please login or register to vote.

No Ratings have been Posted.
Date and time
30 September 2024 09:31
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

19.09.24 12:35
Ha Paul Can you please delete Ludwighenh vor obviius reasons?

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 22:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

Render time: 0.69 seconds | 201,424,047 unique visits