Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 93

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· binturong00:34:25
· Nosferatumyia01:05:58
· Juergen Peters03:57:46
· Oryctes05:23:45
· DedeLab05:49:35
· weia06:49:42
· Liliane D06:53:20
· Volker07:11:54
· Raimo08:31:33
· libor09:46:37
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Miscellaneous :: The Lounge
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Flash Macro Photography
crex
#1 Print Post
Posted on 19-11-2007 09:14
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 1996
Joined: 22.05.06

Ok, I start a thread here to continue the discussion from this thread.

In the Sigma EM-140 DG it is possible to adjust the two lights individually. I think Rafael Estevez mentioned to me that he use this to get a more mellow lighting. I also think he doesn't use the ETTL/TTL, but uses manual settings. When I use ETTL I think the photos are almost always too dark. I'm not sure if this is because of the ringflash or the camera.
 
Krister Hall
#2 Print Post
Posted on 28-11-2007 19:48
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 42
Joined: 29.07.07

This is best corrected by the Flash Exposure Compensation (FEC) on the flash, by setting this to +1/3 for normal situations you should get good results. Normally you should use the ETTL, manual mode is not recomended except for studio photography.
 
http://photo.net/photos/Krister%20Hall
crex
#3 Print Post
Posted on 28-11-2007 20:08
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 1996
Joined: 22.05.06

Yeah, I've also tried FEC, but it didn't do much good as the photos still were underexposed. It's a tricky business using flash.
 
Krister Hall
#4 Print Post
Posted on 28-11-2007 20:37
User Avatar

Member

Location: Sweden
Posts: 42
Joined: 29.07.07

Using flash is supposed to be the non tricky business. I can only see two other explanations:

1. The flash is not strong enough, decrease distance or open up the aparture to test.

2. If you are not softening the flash enough you will get small parts that gets overexposed and when the camera measures the ligth it will compensate for this. Then the rest of the image will be underexposed compared to those highlights.

I?m using E-TTL all the time and do not experience those problems.

/Krister
 
http://photo.net/photos/Krister%20Hall
miked
#5 Print Post
Posted on 24-01-2008 21:49
Member

Location:
Posts: 70
Joined: 20.10.06

Are you using canon camera? I have used a variety of canon cameras with nearly all their flash units over many years and almost all combinations can give under-exposure, sometimes to an extreme degree. It is a 'known issue' and many people have tried over the years to get canon to sort it out but with limited success. the last time i sent a camera/flash combination to the canon repair people they said everthing was working within normal parameters "but you may want to try using exposure compensation", i.e. they knew full well that their system sometimes does not work properly.
Having said all of this, the current canon setup I have (400d+mt24+sigma180mm) is working more or less ok most of the time, it does still have its off days where it will require up to +2 stops for no apparent reason but can live with this on digital so long as the insect has not vanished!
 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Tachinidae > Labigastera forcipata? I add photography... Diptera (adults) 5 14-05-2022 10:10
A better macro of the diptera Diptera (adults) 2 15-04-2015 14:33
Photography, copyright and metadata About the Website (requests, discussion, errors, etc.) 1 17-02-2014 21:43
Macro photos of freshwater amphipods The Lounge 3 15-01-2013 02:21
Stacked macro photograph of a fruit fly Methodology 5 24-12-2012 06:35
Date and time
23 November 2024 05:54
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

21.11.24 04:50
I can no longer send private messages (and maybe not receive?), even though my inbox and outbox are not yet full. I write, click "send" and they disappear and never show up in the outbox.

08.11.24 17:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

Render time: 0.95 seconds | 204,675,785 unique visits