Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 38

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,065
· Newest Member: WkarenBbrewW
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Juergen Peters00:09:54
· John Carr01:16:24
· weia01:40:56
· Carnifex03:06:50
· Rudi03:17:30
· fatsemann03:21:12
· evdb03:38:13
· libor03:56:12
· DedeLab05:37:21
· Nosferatumyia05:43:57
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Syrphidae
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Eupeodes? => E. cf. lundbecki
RamiP
#1 Print Post
Posted on 17-07-2016 18:22
Member

Location:
Posts: 5765
Joined: 25.04.15

17.7.16 in Jyväskylä, Finland
RamiP attached the following image:


[65.67Kb]
Edited by RamiP on 19-07-2016 18:29
 
www.hyonteiset.com
RamiP
#2 Print Post
Posted on 17-07-2016 18:23
Member

Location:
Posts: 5765
Joined: 25.04.15

2
RamiP attached the following image:


[57.06Kb]
 
www.hyonteiset.com
RamiP
#3 Print Post
Posted on 17-07-2016 18:23
Member

Location:
Posts: 5765
Joined: 25.04.15

3
RamiP attached the following image:


[56.97Kb]
 
www.hyonteiset.com
ValerioW
#4 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 08:54
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Yes, the genus you guessed is right! Considering its head I go for E. biciki male.
 
RamiP
#5 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 18:26
Member

Location:
Posts: 5765
Joined: 25.04.15

Thanks Valerio, but it's impossible. E. biciki is founded in Finland only once 1930-40 in Kilpisjärvi (northern Finland) and Jyväskylä is in Middle-Finland.

Rami
 
www.hyonteiset.com
ValerioW
#6 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 18:50
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

RamiP wrote:
Thanks Valerio, but it's impossible. E. biciki is founded in Finland only once 1930-40 in Kilpisjärvi (northern Finland) and Jyväskylä is in Middle-Finland.

Rami



I see but with that head, and that scutellum, I don't find any other option.


Have you got better dorsal view of its head?
 
Stephane Lebrun
#7 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 19:11
User Avatar

Member

Location: Le Havre, France
Posts: 8248
Joined: 03.03.07

Eupeodes lundbecki is an alternative : both species are very similar. E. lundbecki, like E. biciki has a wide ocular angle (~120°). E. lundbecki is said similar to a Scaeva in appearance, except that the eyes are bare. Other features that distinguishes it from E. biciki are : wing : covered more than 50 % with microtrichia ; eyes : upper facets larger then lower ones.
Stephane.
 
ValerioW
#8 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 19:14
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Stephane Lebrun wrote:
Eupeodes lundbecki is an alternative : both species are very similar. E. lundbecki, like E. biciki has a wide ocular angle (~120°). E. lundbecki is said similar to a Scaeva in appearance, except that the eyes are bare. Other features that distinguishes it from E. biciki are : wing : covered more than 50 % with microtrichia ; eyes : upper facets larger then lower ones.




Yep! I thought about this too, Stephane, but the differences between these two are not finished:
when I told about "scutellum" I meant that this one fits, because has only pale hairs, while lundbecki has some black hairs (in Scandinavia at least this features is quite useful. I guess in southern Europe should be different). So, I rejected this option and couldn't find any other Smile
Edited by ValerioW on 18-07-2016 19:17
 
ValerioW
#9 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 19:21
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Stephane, another feature is how sternites appear. In E. lundbecki they have oval spots while in E. bicicki they have black bands...quite hard to use without the specimen pinned
 
Stephane Lebrun
#10 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 20:33
User Avatar

Member

Location: Le Havre, France
Posts: 8248
Joined: 03.03.07

Anyway, Eupeodes, except a few easy species is only reliably identiable under lens. When there are some black hairs mixed with pale ones, there are also only visible under the microscope (it is not possible to be sure of their lack/presence on a 640x400 picture).
Stephane.
 
ValerioW
#11 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2016 23:46
User Avatar

Member

Location: Padova - Italy
Posts: 982
Joined: 01.06.12

Stephane Lebrun wrote:
Anyway, Eupeodes, except a few easy species is only reliably identiable under lens. When there are some black hairs mixed with pale ones, there are also only visible under the microscope (it is not possible to be sure of their lack/presence on a 640x400 picture).



110% agree! Smile many IDs by not macro/micro photo are presumptive, not certain
 
RamiP
#12 Print Post
Posted on 19-07-2016 08:51
Member

Location:
Posts: 5765
Joined: 25.04.15

If you (both) give me your Email-address, I can send original pictures with good resolution.

Rami
raimo@pedizona.fi
www.hyonteiset.com
 
www.hyonteiset.com
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Eupeodes luniger ?? Syrphidae 2 03-09-2025 20:49
male Eupeodes luniger? --> confirmed Syrphidae 6 22-08-2025 19:53
ID please > Male Eupeodes? Syrphidae 3 19-07-2025 08:49
Eupeodes latifasciatus? --> confirmed Syrphidae 3 02-05-2025 17:23
ID: Eupeodes luniger? Syrphidae 2 18-04-2025 21:09
Date and time
09 October 2025 01:45
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

24.08.25 16:55
Thanks for your proposal, but for me this option is ineligible.

15.08.25 10:15
For those specialists not active on Facebook, I just ask to consider to join our group on FB. Please, be aware that it is not necessary at all to be active on FB outside the diptera group. Actually, n

15.08.25 10:13
We received requests to get permission to ask for ID in our Facebook group, https://www.facebo
ok.com/groups/1798
95332035235/ Until now we pointed to diptera.info, but since Paul's passing we not

23.06.25 18:10
If you have some spare money, there is a copy (together with keys to pupae and larvae) for sale by Hermann L. Strack, Loguivy Plougras, France

23.06.25 11:18
Appreciate it, Tony Irwin! I got the hint to use the key next to Langton and Pinder key for females of Chironomidae. So no specific queries, except the keys... I will keep this on my list and hope th

19.06.25 15:33
I have the hard copy book, if you have any specific queries, but I'm not scanning the 500+ pages!

02.06.25 18:26
Anyone has "Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 3. Adult Males Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 34"? smolwaarneming@gma
il.com

28.05.25 20:57
I have Russian Coenosia. nikita6510@ya.ru

28.05.25 12:25
Is someone able to share with me "A key to the Russian species of the genus Coenosia"?

08.05.25 18:22
I have

Render time: 1.60 seconds | 243,495,058 unique visits