Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 74

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Volker01:17:17
· binturong03:52:35
· Nosferatumyia04:24:08
· Juergen Peters07:15:56
· Oryctes08:41:55
· DedeLab09:07:45
· weia10:07:52
· Liliane D10:11:30
· Raimo11:49:43
· libor13:04:47
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
An amateurs hunt for the suprasquamal ridge?!
cjam
#1 Print Post
Posted on 09-07-2013 13:43
Member

Location:
Posts: 4
Joined: 09.07.13

Hello all

This is my first post here. I'm an amateur entomologist, with a keen interest in photography.

I'm trying to help a colleague in identifying the suprasquamal ridge on flies. We've got a few key books, but the ridge is often depicted on fairly basic (and frankly confusing) line drawings.

In an attempt to figure out just where to look, I've taken a few photographs of some blow flies in the area we know to be looking, but aren't entirely convinced what we think could be the ridge, is in fact the ridge. If anyone can confirm or point us in the right direction this would be greatly appreciated:

My first attempt, it's not the brownish structure about "8 o'clock" from the base of the halter is it?
farm3.staticflickr.com/2847/9182390358_f40736be46_c.jpg
Fly 1 by Chris_Moody, on Flickr

Different species, could it otherwise be the structure about 3 o'clock from the base of the halter, with hairs at the bottom?
farm8.staticflickr.com/7408/9176468214_b4618c6da2_c.jpg
Fly by Chris_Moody, on Flickr

Different angle, I suspect the calypter may obscure the ridge?
farm8.staticflickr.com/7411/9247154654_a1a2c0c864_c.jpg
Fly 4 by Chris_Moody, on Flickr

Again, any help will be greatly appreciated, thank you all!
 
oxycera
#2 Print Post
Posted on 09-07-2013 17:05
Member

Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
Posts: 251
Joined: 31.12.09

Useful post, I've never been able to find it either.
 
Mark-uk
#3 Print Post
Posted on 09-07-2013 17:59
User Avatar

Member

Location: UK - Hampshire
Posts: 792
Joined: 01.02.10

i have always taken it to be this part... someone correct me if wrong
Mark-uk attached the following image:


[110.61Kb]
Edited by Mark-uk on 09-07-2013 18:03
 
cjam
#4 Print Post
Posted on 09-07-2013 20:16
Member

Location:
Posts: 4
Joined: 09.07.13

Interesting! So it is the structure at the base of the calypter that joins on to the main body of the fly?
 
Liekele Sijstermans
#5 Print Post
Posted on 09-07-2013 22:52
Member

Location: Geldermalsen Netherlands
Posts: 305
Joined: 16.04.05

Supra means above. So the ridge is above the squama. Picture "fly 4" is getting close to it, but you have to bent the squama it bit downwards to see the ridge. the ridge is visable from a dorsal view. If you have access to specimens of Miltogramma punctata that could be helpfull because that species has clearly visible hairs on the ridge.

Liekele
 
cjam
#6 Print Post
Posted on 10-07-2013 00:10
Member

Location:
Posts: 4
Joined: 09.07.13

That is good to know, thanks. I find the terminology and synonyms a bit confusing! Only just realised squama and calypter are one and the same!

If I get the time tomorrow or the day after I will see if I can get another photo from another specimen, dorsal view, with the squama/calypter bent down. I can get a bit closer than in those photos, but not knowing quite where to look made doing so a bit pointless/difficult!
 
cjam
#7 Print Post
Posted on 16-07-2013 09:41
Member

Location:
Posts: 4
Joined: 09.07.13

Hello all again

I had a fresh specimen given to me yesterday, so I've got a different angled photograph. I tried to pin the wings back and manipulate the calypters to get a dorsal view, but it proved a bit too fiddly with the time I had.

farm6.staticflickr.com/5496/9299527080_a14abd5946.jpg
Bluebottle Calypter by Chris_Moody, on Flickr

Is the orangey structure to the lower right of where the wing attaches to the body (and above the calypter), the ridge?

Many thanks for your help!
 
Liekele Sijstermans
#8 Print Post
Posted on 18-07-2013 00:57
Member

Location: Geldermalsen Netherlands
Posts: 305
Joined: 16.04.05

It is.

Liekele

b.t.w. very nice pictures.

 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
'Amateurs as Experts' The Lounge 1 10-11-2006 21:29
Suprasquamal ridge General queries 2 30-04-2005 17:25
Date and time
23 November 2024 09:12
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

21.11.24 04:50
I can no longer send private messages (and maybe not receive?), even though my inbox and outbox are not yet full. I write, click "send" and they disappear and never show up in the outbox.

08.11.24 17:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

Render time: 1.39 seconds | 204,689,416 unique visits