Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Dolichopus ungulatus (Dolichopodidae)? -> yes
|
|
| smol |
Posted on 11-06-2025 07:58
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 403 Joined: 06.07.22 |
Netherlands, 1 Jun 2025 Observation: https://waarneming.nl/observation/353984500/    Very unsure. I am not seeing true dorsal setae on the first tarsomere of the hind tibia, but the first tarsal segment is not shorter as the second and there are no true apical setae on the hind femur (only subapical anterior?). Do not believe it can be anything else, so they might be broken or are the small hairs enough? Edited by smol on 13-06-2025 12:08 |
|
|
|
| Igor Grichanov |
Posted on 13-06-2025 09:48
|
 Member Location: St.Petersburg, Russia Posts: 1759 Joined: 17.08.06 |
It is Dolichopus ungulatus
Igor Grichanov |
 |
|
| smol |
Posted on 13-06-2025 12:08
|
|
Member Location: Posts: 403 Joined: 06.07.22 |
Igor Grichanov wrote: It is Dolichopus ungulatus Thank you very much it! I have been using the Grichanov (2006)(https://diptera.i...urope.pdfl) key, but I am not understanding one couplet: 31. Hind basitarsus with distinct bristle above.......................................Dolichopus – Hind basitarsus without bristles above..........................................................32 Is this in reference to think short bristles from top to bottom of the basitarsus, or does this also variate between Dolichopus? I suppose my frame of reference is a bit limited to interpret this characteristic, but I can see the obvious less thick bristles in my other post (https://diptera.i..._id=115616). Hope I can recognize this to try to ID these more certain. Appreciate the help! |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |