Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (adults)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 which fly? -> Berkshiria hungarica
|
|
| ole |
Posted on 01-06-2021 16:15
|
 Member Location: copenhagen /Denmark Posts: 812 Joined: 29.11.07 |
First thought of Stratiomyidae (Neopachygaster meromelas) but antennae seems to misfits.... Found in rather dark forest on dead aspen (Populus tremula) near Copenhagen. Thanks in advance, Ole ole attached the following image:  [229.35Kb] Edited by ole on 02-06-2021 11:18 |
|
|
|
| ole |
Posted on 01-06-2021 16:17
|
|
Member Location: copenhagen /Denmark Posts: 812 Joined: 29.11.07 |
- unfortunately no pix from above
ole attached the following image:  [194.67Kb] |
|
|
|
| John Carr |
Posted on 01-06-2021 17:14
|
 Member Location: Massachusetts, USA Posts: 10172 Joined: 22.10.10 |
Reminds me of the North American Berkshiria albistylum but the antenna is slightly different. Do you have that genus in Europe? |
 |
|
| Tony Irwin |
Posted on 01-06-2021 18:48
|
 Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Berkshiria hungarica (known from Sweden) is very similar to albistylum
Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
|
| ole |
Posted on 01-06-2021 23:49
|
|
Member Location: copenhagen /Denmark Posts: 812 Joined: 29.11.07 |
Hi! Berkshiria hungarica seems not to be recorded from Denmark acc. to https://fauna-eu.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/6da81831-ebbc-4f5e-8665-a4bb1529750f Seems Berkshiria hungarica is syn. albistylum: https://www.diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=8246&rowstart=20 I´ve heavily croped the image to show the antennae, Can the ID be confirmed? ole attached the following image:  [256.4Kb] |
|
|
|
| Paul Beuk |
Posted on 02-06-2021 07:47
|
 Super Administrator Location: Netherlands Posts: 19363 Joined: 11.05.04 |
ID confirmed and, no, they are not synonyms. See the last post in the thread quoted.
Paul - - - - Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info |
|
|
|
| ole |
Posted on 02-06-2021 10:25
|
|
Member Location: copenhagen /Denmark Posts: 812 Joined: 29.11.07 |
Thank you very much for confirmation, Paul. - and reading it once more I see I got it vrong, they are not syn. Best regards, Ole |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
