Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Hoverflies from Surrey, UK

Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:37
#1

Any help would be appreciated, although I understand if it's not possible to ID some of them based on just a photo.

Possible Eristalis species?

Edited by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:39

Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:41
#2

And another...

Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:43
#3

Possible Eupeodes luniger?

Edited by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:46

Posted by billsbirding on 22-04-2013 23:47
#4

Last one! Could this be Cheilosia vernalis, or am I being a bit optimistic hoping for an ID to species level.

Posted by ChrisR on 23-04-2013 00:36
#5

Welcome to the forum Bill ... just a small tip though - it helps if you post each species in a different thread. Mixed threads can be confusing to follow and difficult to search for :)

Posted by billsbirding on 23-04-2013 01:14
#6

ChrisR wrote:
Welcome to the forum Bill ... just a small tip though - it helps if you post each species in a different thread. Mixed threads can be confusing to follow and difficult to search for :)


Apologies, Chris. I guess I'm just used to uploading photos in bulk to one post; thought it would be silly to clog up the forum with four different threads, but I'll take note for next time :)

Edited by billsbirding on 23-04-2013 01:14

Posted by jeremyr on 23-04-2013 08:47
#7

Hi Bill,

the first two flies are definitely Eristalis as you can see the dipped vein. Pale front tarsi mark both out as E. pertinax, the second fly looks like a hairy spring-brood specimen.

E. luniger looks probable but from this picture it's difficult to be certain, and I don't think there are that many Cheilosia that can be readily identified from a picture

Jeremy

Edited by jeremyr on 23-04-2013 08:49

Posted by Fred Fly on 23-04-2013 08:49
#8

1 Eristalis pertinax
2 Eristalis pertinax
3 Eupeodes corollae
4 Platycheirus sp.