Thread subject: Diptera.info :: tachinids in love - Linnaemya cf. picta?

Posted by Sundew on 07-06-2012 21:47
#1

Hi,
Today I saw this happy couple on a house wall. Using all my modest experience, I would call them Linnaemya tesselans, the only Linnaemya species Theo said to be expected here. I often took photos of this fly but obviously met only females up to now, as I never recognized that there are red abdomen parts. This male is reddish, however, and in the internet I found pictures that show the same colouration. A confirmation of the name would be fine, as I am still far from being a Tachinid expert (what a luck we have some excellent in this forum!).
Many thanks, Sundew

Edited by Sundew on 25-06-2012 12:21

Posted by Sundew on 07-06-2012 21:48
#2

Another pic.

Posted by Sundew on 07-06-2012 21:48
#3

The heads.

Posted by ChrisR on 08-06-2012 09:37
#4

Certainly Linnaemya but hard to say more without specimens. L. tessellans is confirmed by seeing white hairs on sternite 1 ... the other species require checking out the size/distribution of the black bristles on the back of the head. Others might be able to say whether it looks right for tessellans though, from long experience of the alternatives :)

Edited by ChrisR on 08-06-2012 09:38

Posted by Sundew on 08-06-2012 20:53
#5

Well, in the following pic a bit of sternite one of the female is seen laterally, but it is difficult to say even in high magnification whether there are white hairs or if it is just a matter of light...

Edited by Sundew on 08-06-2012 20:54

Posted by ChrisR on 08-06-2012 23:50
#6

Well, sternite 3 or 4 is visible ... but sternite 1 is a tiny sliver of chitin at the base of the abdomen ... very hard to see, even with a specimen.

Posted by Zeegers on 09-06-2012 11:27
#7

Need to check this.
First impression is that it is NOT tessellans.


Theo

Posted by Sundew on 10-06-2012 12:40
#8

Sorry for the sternite 1 - if it is so tiny, we have to turn the flies upside down... However, Theo doubts L. tesselans, so I add another magnification of the female head. Perhaps the bristles on its back might be seen and be helpful to an expert. If not, then let it be Linnaemyia spec., you did a great work already. Many thanks!

Posted by Sundew on 21-06-2012 23:17
#9

What is the result of your check, Theo?

Posted by Jaakko on 22-06-2012 14:03
#10

IŽd wote for picta. Quite frequent early summer this year.

Posted by sd on 22-06-2012 17:05
#11

Me too. Pale humerus, bristles below the eyes, mouth strongly pulled forward and narrow dark frons suggest picta I think. Only seen one here so far this year - season is a few weeks later than last year.

Steve

Posted by Sundew on 25-06-2012 12:16
#12

Many thanks to both of you! The reddish tibiae fit well, too. What about the magnifications of the head shots - do the bristles give no hints? As L. picta is still missing in the gallery, I'd like to supply some pictures. Should I better add a "cf." to be on the safe side without a caught specimen?

Edited by Sundew on 25-06-2012 12:17