Thread subject: Diptera.info :: Thai, Tephritidae

Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 16-11-2006 14:27
#1

Pattaya, 16 Nov, 6-7mm.
Near Ceratitis?

Posted by John Smit on 28-11-2006 09:32
#2

Hi Nikita,

Totally overlooked this one.
Not that I can be of much help.... it's an Tephritid. And that's pretty much all I can say about it, sorry.
It somewhat reminds me of Ceratitini, but I would need the wingvenation.

Cheers,
John

Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 29-11-2006 13:50
#3

Thank you John.
It is dorsal image with venation.
Nikita

Posted by John Smit on 04-12-2006 16:03
#4

Hi Nikita,

Thanks for the second image.
Still hard to identify, but I will try. Give a few days and I hope to come up with an answer.

John

Posted by John Smit on 08-12-2006 11:45
#5

Hi Nikita,

It took a while, but I cam up with an answer: Phaeospilodes torquata. I am absolutely convinced it is this species, for the thrax pattern, the bristles, especially the very strong develloped ocellar bristels and the wingpattern fits perfectly. Fotunately there is a key for Thailand and the bordering countries ;)
Though it still was sometimes difficult to chose between characters that are not visible, e.g. the thorax should be coverred with fine yellowish setae... I'll just have to take their word for it, for it's not visible in your pfotographs.

Best wishes,

John

Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 08-12-2006 12:35
#6

Thank you John!
Identificated Thai flies are still so rare!
Nikita
Monday in Zool museum I'll check fine yellowish setae on thorax.

Posted by Nikita Vikhrev on 08-12-2006 13:07
#7

John!
According Hancock D. L.; Drew R. A. I. in article:
Bamboo-shoot fruit flies of Asia (Diptera: Tephritidae: Ceratitidinae)
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/tnah/1999/00000033/00000005/art00001
Phaeospilodes torquata is synonym of Phaeospilodes fenestella (Coquillett).
Nikita
Bay the way I foudn this fly exactly where it has to live - in dark forest of spiny bamboo!

Posted by John Smit on 08-12-2006 21:38
#8

Hi Nikita,

You're right. I neglected to look up the up-to-date nomenclature, and you're absolutely right.

John