Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 29

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,024
· Newest Member: Mariem
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Mabuva202100:59:25
· Juergen Peters03:44:58
· weia04:11:33
· John Carr04:17:26
· DedeLab05:55:27
· Carnifex05:59:43
· JC_Bartolucci06:30:54
· Joerg Schneider06:51:23
· Mario Renden06:56:06
· alenkat07:06:34
Latest Photo Additions
Shoutbox Archive
You must login to post a message.
Nikita Vikhrev 22 May 2007 10:03:22
Paul, change, please in new photos: Pegoma to Pegomya Scato to Scathophaga.
Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 11:59:57
OK - I forgot about it
Paul Beuk 21 May 2007 11:45:00
Black, why not submit those as weblinks? See Navigation Panel for the link.
Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 09:22:54
Chaves, A. - ... PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS ... OPOMYZOIDEA ... A GENERIC REVISION OF AULACIGASTER ... - 12023Kb http://tinyurl.com/ywvvsy
Dmitry Gavryushin 21 May 2007 09:22:14
Kerr, Peter H. - Revision of the Genera of the Rhagionidae of the World (Diptera: Brachycera) - 41105Kb http://tinyurl.com/yscju2
Kahis 18 May 2007 14:09:02
For the FAQ: If you don't see the "Quick Reply" field, you'll need to use the post reply button and re-accept the Code of Conduct.
jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 09:03:17
good idea. Smile
Paul Beuk 16 May 2007 08:20:23
Maybe take the discussion to the forum...?
jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:16:23
(*...)unique that can be considered discrete units. the genes are virtually ethernal, the species not. Sad
jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:14:27
(*...) on the basis of certain specialized features, and that had a common ancestor and unique evolutionary history." and in nature we had so many greys, that perhaps just genes are the uniqu
jorgemotalmeida 16 May 2007 00:12:34
there are some versions for species... one of the best but even with problems... is this one: "discrete group of individual organisms that can be diagnosed, or defined on the basis of certain spe
Xespok 15 May 2007 11:30:49
No, actually I think is doable for macroscopical organisms, it is a question of resources and a strict definition of species. For microscopic creatures defining the species does not make too much sens
jorgemotalmeida 15 May 2007 00:04:27
*were found (not was found). In tropics, it is very hard to follow in vivo the biology of species. And there are other problems: hybridism, for example! And what about the species that will go extinc
jorgemotalmeida 15 May 2007 00:01:23
i think that is an impossible task to describe even the million of species. For example, recently was found new mamifers.. awkward and cycliophors...
Xespok 14 May 2007 17:57:12
Yes, I think the goals are different. EOL give species level description of every species. TOL - understanding relationships between life forms.
Kahis 14 May 2007 14:43:32
proctoss: not all all. Unline the EoL, the ToL doesn't go to species level in most lifeforms.
proctoss 12 May 2007 15:52:35
Interestingly enough, but it is a direct competitor of the existing project Tree of Life http://tolweb.org/tree/
Xespok 11 May 2007 09:19:39
Yes, I think the EOL is a good and necessary project. Let us see the details first.
jorgemotalmeida 10 May 2007 15:52:54
http://tinyurl.com/2ggtxt
Smile
jorgemotalmeida 10 May 2007 11:43:23
funny... today was launched the megaloman project ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE: http://www.eol.org We can participate with diptera! What do you think? Smile
Date and time
12 May 2025 04:43
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

08.05.25 18:22
I have

03.05.25 08:35
Does someone has a scan of Nartshuk E.P. 2003. Key to families of Diptera (Insecta) of the fauna of Russian and adjacent countries. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute Vol. 294: 1-252 for me?

10.03.25 18:02
We are looking for a new webmaster https://diptera.in
fo/forum/viewthrea
d.php?thread_id=11
5023&rowstart=20

04.03.25 17:10
Please use the link posted below to remember and honour Paul, if you wish

04.03.25 17:09
I propose in respect to him not to post on trivial matters until his cremation, March 8th

04.03.25 17:08
For those unaware: Paul, the owner, past away two days ago. https://diptera.in
fo/forum/viewthrea
d.php?thread_id=11
5023

19.12.24 12:33
Received missing pages from @royensoc.co.uk, free download available for a few days: https://we.tl/t-vk
a2lFLsYU

17.12.24 23:03
Downloaded the British Handbook Diptera: Bibionid and Scatopsidae flies but pages 58, 59, 67, 68 are missing. Anybody has a complete copy?

08.11.24 16:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 13:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

Render time: 0.06 seconds | 222,548,708 unique visits