Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 26

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,985
· Newest Member: Jogvan F
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· Jan Maca00:06:28
· pierred00:25:46
· ESant00:40:58
· Nosferatumyia00:47:59
· Reimund Ley00:57:36
· smol01:41:28
· libor02:49:15
· Jogvan F03:29:57
· Pentti Ketola04:09:12
· weia04:16:36
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Other insects, spiders, etc.
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
Psyllopsis
John Bratton
#1 Print Post
Posted on 20-08-2007 14:18
Member

Location: Menai Bridge, North Wales, UK
Posts: 650
Joined: 17.10.06

Is anyone able to answer a query about Psylloidea please? I caught one recently in North Wales, UK, by beating ash trees. Using the 1979 Royal Entomological Society key by Hodkinson & White, I've got it to either Psyllopsis fraxini or distinguenda, but there then seems to be a mismatch between the figures and the text. My specimen fits figs 97, 98 and 99, which the captions and key say is fraxini. But the text of the key says if the proctiger has the maximum breadth in the basal third, as mine has and fig. 97 shows, it is distinguenda. What species do figs 97 and 98 really depict, please?

The wing pattern of mine fits fig 86 in that it doesn't have the extra lobe in the apical dark mark. Has this any significance?

John Bratton
 
John Bratton
#2 Print Post
Posted on 25-08-2007 12:10
Member

Location: Menai Bridge, North Wales, UK
Posts: 650
Joined: 17.10.06

Peter Kirby was able to answer it:

"Nearly all the splodgy-winged Psyllopsis I've ever looked at, like yours, match figs 97, 98 and 99 in the key, so I assume these are fraxini, as the figure legends suggest and as the text describing it as common supports, and that the trouble is that in the first sentence of the key couplet the phrases "in basal third" and "at approximately mid-height" have been transposed. Accompanying females have certainly always matched the fraxini illustration. I was once going to follow this up and seek additional literature, but lost interest before doing so. The putative fraxini I've looked at include both the wing patterns illustrated, intermediates, and more extreme examples beyond both."

 
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
psyllid ID -> Psyllopsis cf. fraxini Other insects, spiders, etc. 3 07-01-2021 09:23
Date and time
05 October 2024 14:19
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 22:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

27.12.22 22:10
Thanks, Jan Willem! Much appreciated. Grin

Render time: 0.54 seconds | 201,691,239 unique visits