Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Diptera (eggs, larvae, pupae)
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
Fresh watter insects 2 id ?
|
|
BubikolRamios |
Posted on 12-04-2014 22:29
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 1726 Joined: 14.06.09 |
Stil fresh vatter, Slovenia. 1. Lots of these (can this be told to species exact ?): http://agrozoo.ne...fb76492b47 2. These ar much rarer comparing to above: http://agrozoo.ne...afb0df54e5 highly searchable nature photo galery --> http://agrozoo.ne....jsp?l2=en |
Marc T |
Posted on 13-04-2014 07:19
|
Member Location: Hamburg, Germany Posts: 248 Joined: 30.08.11 |
Hi BubikolRamios, you already characterized the larvae as members of the Culicidae - the 2nd might be the pupa of the 1st!? Just a guess, can't say any further to species. (By-the-way: maybe try at the section 'Diptera (eggs, larvae, pupae)' Best regards, Marc Edited by Marc T on 13-04-2014 07:20 |
|
|
BubikolRamios |
Posted on 13-04-2014 08:50
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 1726 Joined: 14.06.09 |
Thanks. Doh the second is not fixed as I would presume for pupa. It moves fast in contracting manner. Edited by BubikolRamios on 13-04-2014 08:58 highly searchable nature photo galery --> http://agrozoo.ne....jsp?l2=en |
BubikolRamios |
Posted on 13-04-2014 08:52
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 1726 Joined: 14.06.09 |
note: http://www.dipter...d_id=37929 http://naturephot...-2011.html Edited by BubikolRamios on 13-04-2014 08:54 highly searchable nature photo galery --> http://agrozoo.ne....jsp?l2=en |
Tony Irwin |
Posted on 13-04-2014 17:48
|
Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
BubikolRamios wrote: Doh the second is not fixed as I would presume for pupa. It moves fast in contracting manner. Culicidae are one of the few fly families with very active pupae - as they are exposed, rather than hidden, they need some means of escaping predators and their rapid movement certainly makes them difficult to catch. Your larvae are Aedes/Ochlerotatus, but I can't see enough detail in your photos to take them further. Edited by Tony Irwin on 13-04-2014 18:02 Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
BubikolRamios |
Posted on 16-04-2014 06:33
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 1726 Joined: 14.06.09 |
I guess Culex pipiens. This specimen came out: http://agrozoo.ne...c297b1ba49 highly searchable nature photo galery --> http://agrozoo.ne....jsp?l2=en |
Tony Irwin |
Posted on 16-04-2014 11:56
|
Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
I'm not sure why you feel this is Culex pipiens - it is clearly an Aedes (s.l.) species, probably Ochlerotatus annulipes. If you check on a reliable site (Diptera.info!) for images of Culex pipiens, you'll see that the legs have no pale rings, and that the palps are a different shape.
Edited by Tony Irwin on 16-04-2014 11:57 Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
BubikolRamios |
Posted on 16-04-2014 14:01
|
Member Location: Slovenia Posts: 1726 Joined: 14.06.09 |
OK, did not put ? mark on end of my statement. I was not so sure as it reads. Thanks. highly searchable nature photo galery --> http://agrozoo.ne....jsp?l2=en |
Jump to Forum: |