Diptera.info :: Family forums :: Asilidae Forum
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Dioctria hyalipennis
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 27-07-2006 22:58
|
 Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
From midwest Sweden 2006-07-12. I guess it is Dioctria rufipes. Am I right? TIA! Edit: Changed subject (Dioctria rufipes?) crex attached the following image:  [72.31Kb] Edited by crex on 12-09-2006 02:55 |
|
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 27-07-2006 23:14
|
|
Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
Here is another one from a couple of days later. I think it is the same species. I find it interesting to see the way it is using the legs when it "sits" down for dinner "eating" a small spider.
crex attached the following image:  [71.21Kb] |
|
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 11-09-2006 20:14
|
|
Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
No thoughts on this matter? |
|
|
|
| Tony Irwin |
Posted on 12-09-2006 01:06
|
 Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Hi Crex I don't think this is rufipes. The antennal tubercle is too small. I think it must be Dioctria hyalipennis, as there are no other similar species in Sweden. I think your second photo is great - the tripod of mid-legs and abdomen leaves four legs free to handle the most awkward meal! 
Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 12-09-2006 02:47
|
|
Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
Thanks Tony, I really appreciate it! |
|
|
|
| crex |
Posted on 12-09-2006 02:54
|
|
Member Location: Sweden Posts: 1996 Joined: 22.05.06 |
I forgot to ask. Is this a female? |
|
|
|
| Tony Irwin |
Posted on 12-09-2006 08:59
|
|
Member Location: Norwich, England Posts: 7232 Joined: 19.11.04 |
Yes. Dioctria males do not have very prominent genitalia, but they do have a larger terminal segment than the females. Also no male would ever have such large abdomen - it is clearly swelling up with developing eggs.
Tony ---------- Tony Irwin |
|
|
|
| Jump to Forum: |
