Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 14

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 4,988
· Newest Member: DedeLab
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· DedeLab00:19:40
· Joerg Schneider00:20:10
· weia00:24:34
· libor00:32:59
· ole00:51:53
· Juergen Peters01:05:49
· JWV01:13:43
· piros01:21:26
· ESant01:42:54
· von Tschirnhaus02:03:58
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Miscellaneous :: The Lounge
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
600 vs. 1000 pixels
Tony T
#1 Print Post
Posted on 07-04-2008 15:37
User Avatar

Member

Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 662
Joined: 08.02.07

Pierre Duhem wrote:

"Jorge,
You should nevertheless apply the rule about the 600 pixels width."

in response to a 1000 pixel wide image
See: HERE

A small monitor that will not let you see images at full size if these images are greater than about 600 px wide.
I use Microsoft Windows Explorer 7 to open Diptera.info.
At the bottom of the screen there is a size icon that allows for a page to be scaled from 50%-400%. Thus Jorge' s 1000 px image can easily be scaled down to 500 px.
One gets a better image by scaling down from large to small rather than scaling up from small to large.
 
conopid
#2 Print Post
Posted on 07-04-2008 16:54
User Avatar

Member

Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1039
Joined: 02.07.04

I'm all for the bigger images, but we need to think of the costs of hosting the bigger file sizes, so we (Paul) would probably not want too many of them.
Nigel Jones, Shrewsbury, United Kingdom
 
Tony T
#3 Print Post
Posted on 07-04-2008 17:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 662
Joined: 08.02.07

This is getting out of my limited expertise; but isn't file size a function of the number of bytes? We are allowed a max of 200Kb. Does it make any difference if the image is 600px wide or 2000px wide and yet both are less than 200Kb? In this case the 600px could have a higher JPG quality than the 2000px image.
 
ChrisR
#4 Print Post
Posted on 07-04-2008 19:18
User Avatar

Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7699
Joined: 12.07.04

JPG image size is dependent on the original image size and the amount of compression given to the data. The image dimensions and colour depth obviously have a large impact on the file size but if the file can be compressed heavily then it will give a smaller file size. Images that contain large contigous blocks of similar colours usually compress very well but images with lots of fine detail and strong contrasting colours do not Smile So, yes - it is possible to have a highly compressed 1024x768 pixel image that is smaller on disk than an almost raw 640x480 pixel image Grin
Edited by ChrisR on 07-04-2008 19:20
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
Paul Beuk
#5 Print Post
Posted on 07-04-2008 20:12
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19365
Joined: 11.05.04

It may be that the next version of the content management system has a solution for these wider images, but still I'd prefer the smaller size (pixel-wise). I am not certain how that would work out, but Firefox has a nice image zoom extension that will allow you to increase the size of images as they are displayed. On higher resolution images I have used this succesfully to see more details but also to reduce some blownup images in size because images that do not have enough resolution to be blown up can actually show more detail when they are decreased in size.
Don't worry about the server load yet. I only notice the problem when I am making my backups on a local hard drive, but since that backup is incremental I only notice each image once.
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
ChrisR
#6 Print Post
Posted on 08-04-2008 00:34
User Avatar

Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7699
Joined: 12.07.04

It would be very easy to resize any incoming image to a predetermined maximum dimensions - I have written the code many times for various sites ... but I wouldn't like to explore the inner depths of php-fusion Wink
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
pierred
#7 Print Post
Posted on 08-04-2008 07:42
User Avatar

Member

Location: Paris (France)
Posts: 1437
Joined: 21.04.05

Hello,

Chris Raper wrote:
It would be very easy to resize any incoming image to a predetermined maximum dimensions - I have written the code many times for various sites ... but I wouldn't like to explore the inner depths of php-fusion Wink


This would naturally be the best solution. On our French forum, a click on the displayed pictures displays the real size and a new click returns to the 600 (or is it 550 ? I don't remember off my head) pixels version.
Pierre Duhem
 
Jump to Forum:
Date and time
26 November 2024 23:38
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

08.11.24 17:10
Www.abebooks.com

29.07.24 14:19
Don't suppose anyone knows anwhere selling a copy of Contributions to a Manual of Palaearctic Diptera 2? Always wanted a copy.... Smile

16.07.24 12:37
TumbsUp

11.07.24 13:59
Following up on the update provided by Paul on the donations received in 2024, I just made a donation. Follow my example Wink

17.08.23 16:23
Aneomochtherus

17.08.23 14:54
Tony, I HAD a blank in the file name. Sorry!

17.08.23 14:44
Tony, thanks! I tried it (see "Cylindromyia" Wink but don't see the image in the post.

17.08.23 12:37
pjt - just send the post and attached image. Do not preview thread, as this will lose the link to the image,

16.08.23 09:37
Tried to attach an image to a forum post. jpg, 32kB, 72dpi, no blanks, ... File name is correctly displayed, but when I click "Preview Thread" it just vanishes. Help!

23.02.23 22:29
Has anyone used the Leica DM500, any comments.

Render time: 1.85 seconds | 205,005,827 unique visits