Gallery Links
Users Online
· Guests Online: 34

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 5,038
· Newest Member: Jerome MARIE
Forum Threads
Theme Switcher
Switch to:
Last Seen Users
· evdb00:09:24
· smol00:11:08
· mwkozlowski00:21:19
· pierred00:23:59
· weia00:52:32
· eklans00:56:25
· Volker00:58:30
· blaauw701:13:32
· BLecaplain01:15:12
· RamiP01:34:22
Latest Photo Additions
View Thread
Diptera.info :: Identification queries :: Other insects, spiders, etc.
Who is here? 1 guest(s)
 Print Thread
panorpa communis?
Makro Freak
#1 Print Post
Posted on 20-12-2007 04:07
User Avatar

Member

Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 179
Joined: 22.05.07

loc. munich germany, forrest


hi,

is this panorpa communis ?


rick
Makro Freak attached the following image:


[115.06Kb]
Edited by Makro Freak on 20-12-2007 04:08
 
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Makro_Freak
ChrisR
#2 Print Post
Posted on 20-12-2007 13:21
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7703
Joined: 12.07.04

Difficult to say, but I don't think so. In the UK we have 3 species (cognata, communis & germanica) and in male communis the 2 filaments on the genitalia are curved and converge at the tips. In germanica they diverge and are swollen at the tip - while on cognata they diverge and are tapered at the tips. So, if I was to choose between the 3 UK species then I would say it is most likely to be Panorpa cognata - but you might have other species in your location Smile
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
Andre
#3 Print Post
Posted on 20-12-2007 19:15
User Avatar

Member

Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Posts: 2111
Joined: 18.07.04

No, it's defenitely not cognata. For cognata the dark bands on the wings are way too strong. This one belongs to the vulgaris/communis-twins... Looking at the first spot on the wing, seen from the basis, being reduced between the two longitudinal veins (cubitus resp. media), I suggest it is communis.
Also the other dark bands look, in average!, less strongly developped than in vulgaris. Also the wings tend to look more slender.. All these characters are very variable I must add at once, but communis is the best candidate for this specimen, based on a picture.
 
www.biomongol.org
Iolaire
#4 Print Post
Posted on 21-12-2007 11:06
User Avatar

Member

Location: Langedijk, Netherlands
Posts: 192
Joined: 17.08.07

I agree it's not cognata. Although cognata has variations in the bands on the wings as well.
I think it's best to name this "Panorpa sp." just because it's not possible to ID the species based on this picture. P. communis is likely, I admit, but surely not 100%. Too little details, too many variations...Wink
Best regards,

Iolaire
 
ChrisR
#5 Print Post
Posted on 21-12-2007 12:51
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Reading, England
Posts: 7703
Joined: 12.07.04

Yes, in the British species there are trends with wing pattern but I have never relied on them for identifications. The male genital capsule is always the best way to go. I have put this photo through PhotoShop and I believe it is just very under-exposed - giving the dark markings too much prominence. With a little adjustment of the levels it is possible to see that the wing markings are probably not so dark in reality and the filaments on the genital capsule definitely do not converge at the tips - and might even be swollen, suggesting germanica. With the original photo it might be possible to do more though Smile
 
http://tachinidae.org.uk
Andre
#6 Print Post
Posted on 23-12-2007 14:33
User Avatar

Member

Location: Tilburg, the Netherlands
Posts: 2111
Joined: 18.07.04

This defenitely is not germanica. No question about it. Not only based on the genitalia, also on the wingpattern, yes. Smile
Photoshop, underexposure or not, this also defenitely is not cognata, also based on the vissible parts of the genitalia and, yes, clearly by the wingpattern.
I stick to my former conclusion. Wink
 
www.biomongol.org
Gordon
#7 Print Post
Posted on 26-01-2008 09:04
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lake Kerkini, Greece
Posts: 1101
Joined: 02.01.08

Hi,
Would any of you knowledgeable people be interested in looking at my Mecopterans for me, I have 8 tubes of probably panorpa species from my biodiversity study of Lake Kerkini, Greece. Or does anybody know anybody who would be interested to see this material???????GrinGrin
 
www.earthlife.net/  www.earthlife.net/bluemagpie/
Paul Beuk
#8 Print Post
Posted on 26-01-2008 09:23
User Avatar

Super Administrator

Location: Netherlands
Posts: 19403
Joined: 11.05.04

Try Wim Hogenes at the Zoological Museum of Amsterdam: hogenes at science.uva.nl
Paul

- - - -

Paul Beuk on https://diptera.info
 
diptera.info
Gordon
#9 Print Post
Posted on 27-01-2008 09:20
User Avatar

Member

Location: Lake Kerkini, Greece
Posts: 1101
Joined: 02.01.08

Thanks Paul, I will send him an email now.
 
www.earthlife.net/  www.earthlife.net/bluemagpie/
Jump to Forum:
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Panorpa sp. => Panorpa vulgaris Other insects, spiders, etc. 3 28-02-2022 13:34
Panorpa communis or vulgaris ? Other insects, spiders, etc. 5 03-08-2021 19:29
Mecoptera? Panorpa sp.? Diptera (adults) 4 21-06-2021 20:24
Panorpa vulgaris <= Other insects, spiders, etc. 3 03-06-2021 13:53
Panorpa ID => P. communis Other insects, spiders, etc. 5 23-01-2021 13:05
Date and time
30 June 2025 09:19
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Temporary email?
Due to fact this site has functionality making use of your email address, any registration using a temporary email address will be rejected.

Paul
Donate
Please, help to make
Diptera.info
possible and enable
further improvements!
Latest Articles
Syrph the Net
Those who want to have access to the Syrph the Net database need to sign the
License Agreement -
Click to Download


Public files of Syrph the Net can be downloaded HERE

Last updated: 25.08.2011
Shoutbox
You must login to post a message.

23.06.25 18:10
If you have some spare money, there is a copy (together with keys to pupae and larvae) for sale by Hermann L. Strack, Loguivy Plougras, France

23.06.25 11:18
Appreciate it, Tony Irwin! I got the hint to use the key next to Langton and Pinder key for females of Chironomidae. So no specific queries, except the keys... I will keep this on my list and hope th

19.06.25 15:33
I have the hard copy book, if you have any specific queries, but I'm not scanning the 500+ pages!

02.06.25 18:26
Anyone has "Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 3. Adult Males Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 34"? smolwaarneming@gma
il.com

28.05.25 20:57
I have Russian Coenosia. nikita6510@ya.ru

28.05.25 12:25
Is someone able to share with me "A key to the Russian species of the genus Coenosia"?

08.05.25 18:22
I have

03.05.25 08:35
Does someone has a scan of Nartshuk E.P. 2003. Key to families of Diptera (Insecta) of the fauna of Russian and adjacent countries. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute Vol. 294: 1-252 for me?

10.03.25 18:02
We are looking for a new webmaster https://diptera.in
fo/forum/viewthrea
d.php?thread_id=11
5023&rowstart=20

04.03.25 17:10
Please use the link posted below to remember and honour Paul, if you wish

Render time: 2.55 seconds | 229,618,013 unique visits